Developing a Model of Ethical Leadership Prediction Based on Normative and Individual (Behavioral) Variables

Document Type : علمی - پژوهشی

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Management, Faculty of Education and Counseling, Rudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rudehen, Iran (Corresponding author)

2 Ph.D student, Department of Educational. university of Roudehen. Roudehen. Iran

3 Assistant Professor. Department of Educational Management, Faculty of Education and Counseling. , Rudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rudehen, Iran

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to present a model of predicting ethical leadership based on normative and individual variables. Method: The research method was applied in terms of purpose; It is exploratory in terms of mixed data type and descriptive-correlation in data collection time. The qualitative part of the study's statistical population consisted of academic experts and senior managers of Islamic Azad University who were selected by purposeful sampling and the saturation principle of 20 individuals as sample size. The second group consisted of all full-time faculty members of Islamic Azad University of Tehran province. Five hundred seventy-six individuals were selected by a random cluster sampling method. In this study, data collection was done by library method, semi-structured interview, and researcher-made questionnaire, which confirmed the validity of the interview. In this study, qualitative and quantitative parts were used for data analysis. Result: The findings showed that the components of value, job satisfaction, motivation, personality, creativity, individual components and organizational communication, organizational culture, organizational structure, decision-making styles, roles and expectations, goals, and strategies, As normative components. Conclusion: A model was developed that also addressed the components, mechanisms, contexts, and barriers of ethical leadership

Keywords

References

Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2017). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership. John Wiley & Sons.
George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good-doing good: a conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological bulletin, 112(2), 310.
Lake, R. W. (2017). A humanist perspective on knowledge for planning: Implications for theory, research, and practice. Planning Theory and Practice, 18(2), 291-319.
Leroy, H., Anseel, F., Gardner, W. L., & Sels, L. (2015). Authentic leadership, authentic followership, basic need satisfaction, and work role performance: A cross-level study. Journal of Management, 41(6), 1677-1697.
Miao, Q., Eva, N., Newman, A., & Cooper, B. (2017). CEO entrepreneurial leadership and performance outcomes of top management teams in entrepreneurial ventures: The mediating effects of psychological safety. Journal of Small Business Management.
Murphy, J., Rhodes, M. L., Meek, J. W., & Denyer, D. (2017). Managing the entanglement: complexity leadership in public sector systems. Public Administration Review, 77(5), 692-704.
Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2017). Human resource management: Gaining a competitive advantage. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of management, 34(1), 89-126.
 
Career and Organizational Counseling
Volume 13, Issue 1
April 2021
Pages 183-200

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics