اندازه گیری رفتار شهروندی سازمانی: ساخت پرسشنامه ای مبتنی بر نظریه خصیصه مکنون

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسنده

دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

چکیده

هدف مقاله حاضر این بود که با استفاده از پیشینه پژوهشی موجود درباره مفهوم رفتار شهروندی سازمانی و عوامل تشکیل­ دهنده آن یک پرسشنامه برای اندازه ­گیری رفتار شهروندی سازمانی طراحی نماید و سپس ویژگی­های روان­سنجی آن را در چارچوب نظریه خصیصه مکنون برآورد نماید. ابتدا یک مدل مفهومی با جهت­ گیری دو بُعدی رفتار شهروندی سازمانی (جهت­ گیری سازمان-همکاران و جهت­ گیری توسعه دهنده-حفاظت ­کننده) طراحی شد که دربردارنده شش عاملِ وجدان کاری، جوانمردی، فضیلت شهروندی، اُمید بخشی، توسعه شخصی و پایبندی به اصول اخلاقی است. سپس بر اساس شاخص­های معرّفی شده در مدل، یک پرسشنامه 15 سوالی نوشته شد. پس از گردآوری داده‌ها، پارامترهای شیب، پارامتر آستانه تقاطع طبقات پاسخ­دهی، تابع آگاهی و ضریب پایایی پرسشنامه با استفاده از مدل پاسخ مدرّج تحلیل شد. نتایج به­ دست آمده، نشان داد که ویژگی­های روان­سنجی پرسشنامه از وضعیت بسیار قابل قبولی برخوردارند و پرسشنامه ساخته شده با دقّت بالایی می­ تواند بین میزان رفتارهای شهروندی کارکنان تمایز بگذارد و آن را اندازه ­گیری نماید.

عنوان مقاله [English]

Measuring organizational citizenship behavior: Design questionnaires based on latent trait theory

چکیده [English]

The aim of this paper was to use the existing research literature on the concept of organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) and its components is a questionnaire designed to measure organizational citizenship behavior, and then put it in the framework of the psychometric properties of the estimated latent trait theory (LTT). First, a conceptual model with two-dimensional orientation OCB (Organization for Cooperation and orientation orientation developer-protecting) design that includes six factors: conscientiousness, sportsmanship, civic virtue, promising, personal development and commitment to ethical principles. Then, based on indicators introduced in the model, a 15-question questionnaire was written. After collecting data, the slope parameters, parameter threshold intersection response classes, Information function and reliability of the questionnaire were analyzed using graded response model (GRM). The results showed that the psychometric properties of the questionnaire were very acceptable and Favorable. Made questionnaire in this study can accurately differentiate between the organizational citizenship behavior and let them measure the level of civic behavior.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • organizational citizenship behavior- latent trait theory- graded response model- questionnaire

مراجع

  1. Ayala, R.J.D.(2009).The Theory and Practice of Item Response Theory. New York: Guilford Press.
  2. Baker,F.B.(2001). The basics of item response theory. ERIC clearinghouse on assessment and evaluation.
  3. Bateman,T.S., & Organ,D.W.(1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and citizenship. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 587-595.
  4. Carter,N.T., Dalal,D.K., Lake,C.J., Lin,B.C., & Zickar, M.J.(2011). Using mixed-model item response theory to analyze organizational survey responses: An illustration using the job descriptive index. Organizational Research Methods, 14 (1), 116-146.
  5. Coyle-Shapiro,J.A.M.(2002). A psychological contract perspective on organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(8), 927-946.
  6. DeMars,C.(2010). Item response theory. Understanding statistics measurement. City: Oxford University Press.
  7. Hinkin,T.R.(1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21(5),967-988.
  8. Kane,M.T.(2013).Validating the Interpretations and Uses of Test Scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50(1), 1–73.
  9. Kamil,N.M., & Ahmad,K.(2014). Development of a scale for measuring the construct of organizational citizenship behavior from Islamic perspective. Malaysian Management Review, 49 (1), 55-66.
  10. Kirisci,L., Hsu,T., & Yu,L.(2001). Robustness of item parameter estimation programs to assumptions of unidimensionality and normality. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25(2), 146 -162.
  11. LePine,J.A., & Johnson,D.(2002) The Nature and Dimensionality of Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 52-65.
  12. Moorman,R.H., & Blakely,G.L.(1995). Individualism-Collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(2), 127–142.
  13. Moon,H., Van Dyne,L., & Wrobel,K.(2005). The circumplex model and the future of organizational citizenship research. In: Turnipseed D (ed.) A Handbook on Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Review of ‘Good Soldier’ Activity in Organizations. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 1–22.
  14. Moorman,R.H., Niehoff,B.P., & Organ,D.W.(1993). Treating employees fairly and organizational citizenship behavior: Sorting the effects of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and procedural justice. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 6(3), 209-225.
  15. Netemeyer, R.G., Boles, J.S., Mckee, D.O., & McMurrian,R.(1997). An investigation into the antecedents of organizational citizenships behaviours in a personal selling context. Journal of Marketing, 61(3),85-98.
  16. Nielsen,T.M., Hrivnak Jr,G.A., & Shaw,M.(2009). Organizational citizenship behaviour and performance: A meta-analysis of group-level research. Small group research. An International Journal of Theory, Investigation and Application, 40(5), 555-577.
  17. Organ,D.W.(1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
  18. Organ,D.W.(1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 43–72.
  19. Organ,D.W., & Moorman,R.H. (1993). Fairness and organizational citizenship behavior: What are the connections?. Social Justice Research, 6(1), 5-18.
  20. Organ,D.W., & Ryan,K.(1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors’ of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology,48(4), 775-802.
  21. Organ,D.W.(1997). Organizational citizenships behavior: It’s construct cleanup time. Human Performance, 10(2), 85–97.
  22. Parsons,C.K., & Hulin,C.L.(1982). An empirical comparison of item response theory and hierarchical factor analysis in applications to the measurement of job satisfaction. Journal Applied Psycholog, 67(6),826–34.
  23. Podsakoff,N.P., Blume,B.D., Whiting,S.W., & Podsakoff,P.M.(2009). Individual and organizational level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 122-141.
  24. Podsakoff,P.M., MacKenzie,S.B., Moorman,R.H., & Fetter, R.(1990). Transformational leader behaviours and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviours. Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107-142.
  25. Podsakoff,P.M., MacKenzie,S.B., Paine,J.B., & Bachrach,D.G.(2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: a critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513-563.
  26. Rahman,U., Sulaiman,W., Nasir,R., & Omar,F.(2013). Analyzing the construct validity of organizational citizenship behavior scale using confirmatory factor analysis with indonesian samples. Asian Social Science, 9 (13), 85-91.
  27. Reckase,M.D.(1979). Unifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor test: Results and implications. Journal of Educational Statistics,4(3),207-230.
  28. Smith,C.A., Organ,D., & Near,J.P.(1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 653–663.
  29. Sophia.V.M., Moon,H., & Van Dyne,L.(2010). Are all good soldier behaviors the same? Supporting multidimensionality of organizational citizenship behaviors based on rewards and roles. Human Relations, 63(10), 1463–1485.
  30. Takalkar,P. & Coover,M.D.(1994). International replication note: The dimensionality of job satisfaction in India. Applied Psychology, 43(3), 415-426.
  31. Tsutsumi,A., Iwata,N., Watanabe,N., de Jonge,J., Pikhart,H., & Fernandez-Lopez, J.A.(2009). Application of item response theory to achieve cross-cultural comparability of occupational stress measurement. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research,18(1),58–67.
  32. Van Dyne,L., Graham,J.W., & Dienesch,R.M.(1994). Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 765–802.
  33. Williams,L.J., & Anderson,S.E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and inrole behavior. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601-617.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار