تاثیر ایفای نقش و شباهت تمرین‌های شبیه‌سازی در کانون‌های ارزیابی وظیفه‌محور و بعدمحور در عملکرد کارکنان

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه اصفهان

2 دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی

چکیده

این پژوهش با هدف بررسی تفاوت بین شبیه­سازی بالا، متوسط و پایین و معرف بودن و معرف نبودن تمرین­های شبیه­سازی در دو نوع کانون ارزیابی بعد محور و کانون ارزیابی وظیفه محور در توانمندسازی کارکنان در محیط کار انجام شد.پژوهش حاضر از نوع پژوهش های شبه آزمایشی بوده و شرکت کنندگان در پژوهش شامل 24 نفر از مدیران یک شرکت صنعتی بودند که به صورت نمونه هدفمند و با توجه به جدول مورفی و میورز (1999) انتخاب شدند. ابزارهای استفاده شده در پژوهش شامل تمرین­های شبیه­سازی (ایفای نقش، بحث گروهی بدون رهبر، مطالعه موردی) و پرسشنامه توانمند­سازی (اسپریتزر،1995) بود. داده ها توسط تحلیل واریانس یک راهه مورد تحلیل قرار گرفت. نتایج پژوهش حاضر نشان داد که در کانون ارزیابی بعدمحور، بین شبیه­سازی بالا، متوسط و پایین تمرین­های شبیه­سازی تفاوت وجود دارد و در کانون ارزیابی وظیفه­محور، بین معرف بودن و معرف نبودن تمرین­های شبیه­سازی کانون­های ارزیابی تفاوت وجود دارد(05/0>P). بنابراین نتیجه گرفته می­شود که شبیه سازی تمرین­های شبیه­سازی در کانون ارزیابی بعدمحور و معرف بودن تمرین­های شبیه­سازی در کانون ارزیابی وظیفه­محور اهمیت دارد. نتایج پژوهش حاضر در روند استخدام و ارتقا کارکنان از طریق کانون ارزیابی مفید خواهد بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Impact of role playing and simulation of simulation exercises in task-based and dimension-based assessment centers in employee's performance

نویسندگان [English]

  • narges sadat mortazavi 1
  • hamidreza oreyzi 1
  • zohre moosavi 1
  • abbas abbaspour 2
1 university of isfahan
2 Allameh Tabataba'i University
چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference between high, moderate and low simulations, and the fidelity and not fidelity of simulation exercises in two types of dimension- based assessment center and task-based assessment center in employee's empowerment in the workplace.The current study was the quasi experimental research and participants in this study were 24 managers of industrial Company that who were selected through purposeful sample and according to Murphy & Myors's table. The instruments used in the study included the simulations exercises(Role play, Leaderless group discussion and Case study) and Empowerment Questionnaire (Speritzer,1995). Data was analyzed using the one way Anova.The results of this study showed that there is a difference between high, moderate and low simulation of simulation exercises in dimension-based assessment center and there is a difference between fidelity and not fidelity of simulation exercises in task- based assessment center(p

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Empowerment-Simulations exercises-Assessment center(AC)

مراجع

  1. Arthur, W., Jr, &Villado, A.J. (2008).The importance of distinguishing between constructs and methods when comparing predictors in personnel selection research and practice.Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 435–442.
  2. Byham, W. (2010).Assessment center are an excellent way of studying decision making. Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 3, 443-444.
  3. Cascio, W. F., &Aguinis, H. (2005).Applied Psychology in Human Resource Management. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  4. Chen, H. C. (2006). Assessment center: A critical mechanism for assessing HRD effectiveness and accountability. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 8, 247–264.
  5. Chiang, C. F., & Jang, S. (2008). The antecedents and consequences of psychological empowerment: the case of Taiwan's hotel companies. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 32(1), 40-61.
  6. Dayan, K., Fox, S., &Kasten, R. (2008).The preliminary employment interview as a predictor of assessment center outcomes.International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16(2), 102-111.
  7. Dehghani, S., Gharooni, A., &Arabzadeh, A. (2014). Staff Empowerment, Entrepreneurial Behaviors and Organizational Efficiency in Iranian Headquarter Education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 1130-1141.
  8. Delprato, D. J.,&Midgley, B. D. (1992). Some fundamentals of B. F. Skinner’s behaviorism.American Psychologist, 47, 1507–1520.
  9. Fetzer, M., &Tuzinski, K. (Eds.).(2013). Simulations for personnel selection. New York: Springer.
  10. Gatewood, R. D., Field, H. S., &Barrick, M. (2008).Human resource selection.Mason, OH: Thomson Higher Education.
  11. Hoffman, B. J., Melchers, K. G., Blair, C. A., Kleinmann, M., & Ladd, R. T. (2011). Exercises and dimensions are the currency of assessment centers. Personnel Psychology, 64, 351-395.
  12. Hale, C. D. (2010). The assessment center handbook for police and fire personnel. Charles C Thomas Publisher.
  13. Jansen, A., Lievens, F., &Kleinmann, M. (2011). Do individual differences in perceiving situational demands moderate the relationship between personality and assessment center dimension ratings?.Human Performance, 24(3), 231-250.
  14. Krause, D. E., &Gebert, D. (2003). A comparison of assessment center practices in organizations in German‐speaking regions and the United States. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11(4), 297-312.
  15. Lance, C. E., Foster, M. R., Nemeth, Y. M., Gentry, W. A., &Drollinger, S. (2007). Extending the nomological network of assessment center construct validity: Prediction of cross-situationally consistent and specific aspects of assessment center performance.Human Performance, 20(4), 345-362.
  16. Leary, M, R (2004). the self we know and the self we show: self esteem, self presentation and the maintenance of interpersonal relationship, In M. B, Brewer & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Emotion and motivation (pp 204-224). Malden, M, A, Blackwell.
  17. Lee, E. J. (2016). The organizational culture, psychological empowerment, and organization efficiency in fashion companies.The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 24(2), 198-217.
  18. Lowry, P.E. (1995). The assessment center process: Assessing leadership in the public sector. Public Personnel Management, 24, 443-450.
  19. Lowry, P. E. (1997). The assessment center process: New directions. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12(5), 53-62.
  20. Liden, R. C., & Tewksbury, T. W. (1995).Empowerment and work teams. In G. R. Ferris, S. D. Rosen, & D. T. Barnum (Eds.), Handbookof human resources management (pp. 386-403). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
  21. Lievens, F. (2009). Assessment Centers: A tale about dimensions, exercises and dancing bears. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 18(1), 102-121.
  22. Melton, E. K., & Meier, K. J. (2017). For the Want of a Nail: The Interaction of Managerial Capacity and Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 118-130.
  23. Mischel, W. (1984). Convergences and challenges in the search for consistency. American Psychologist, 39, 351–364.
  24. Murphy, K. R., & Myors, B. (1999). Testing the hypothesis that treatments have negligible effects: Minimum-effect tests in the general linear model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(2), 234.
  25. Murphy, N. A. (2007). Appearing smart: The impression management of intelligence, person perception accuracy, and behavior in social interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(3), 325-339.
  26. Oliver, T., Hausdorf, P., Lievens, F., & Conlon, P. (2014). Interpersonal Dynamics in Assessment Center Exercises Effects of Role Player Portrayed Disposition. Journal of Management, 2(1), 1-26.
  27. Prati, G., &Zani, B. (2016).A moderated multilevel study of work-to-family conflict, empowerment, and turnover intentions.Quality & Quantity, 50(5), 2279-2292.
  28. Putka, D. J., &Sackett, P. R. (2010). Reliability and validity. In J. L. Farr & N. T. Tippins (Eds.), Handbook of employee selection: 9-49. New York: Routledge.
  29. Rupp, D. E., Snyder LA, Gibbons AM, Thornton GC III. (2006). What should managerial developmental assessment centers be developing? Psychologist-Manager Journal,9, 75–98.
  30. Schlenker, B, R (2003). Self presentation. In M. R leary& J. P Tangney (EDs.) , Hand book of self and identity (pp 492-518). New York: Guilford.
  31. Schollaert, E,.&Lievens, F. (2011). The use of role-player prompts in assessment center exercises. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19(2), 190-197.
  32. Speritzer. G. M, (1995). Psychological empowerment in the work place.dimensions, measurement, and validation, Academy of management journal, 38, 1442-1465.
  33. Stamoulis, D. (2009). Senior executive assessment: A key to responsible corporate governance. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
  34. Suri, S. (2014). Human resource information system: An innovative approach to improve Human Resource Management effectiveness. International Journal of Managment, IT and Engineering, 4(3), 124-137.
  35. Swanson, J. D. (2011). Examining developmental assessment center participation on self-assessment changes: A moderated mediation model.Doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University.
  36. Thornton III, G. C., & Rupp, D. E. (2006). Assessment centers in human resource management: Strategies for prediction, diagnosis, and development. Psychology Press.‏
  37. Thornton, G. C. III., & Mueller-Hanson, R. A. (2004).Developing organizational simulations: A guide for practitioners and students. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbau.
  38. Thornton, G. C., & Gibbons, A. M. (2009). Validity of assessment centers for personnel selection. Human Resource Management Review, 19(3), 169-187.
  39. Tjosvold, D., Hui, C., & Law, K. S. (1998). Empowerment in the manager-employee relationship in Hong Kong:Interdependence and controversy. The Journal of social psychology, 138(5), 624-636.
  40. Tolley, H., & Wood, R. (2011).How to Succeed at an Assessment Centre: Essential Preparation for Psychometric Tests Group and Role-play Exercises Panel Interviews and Presentations. Kogan Page Publishers.
  41. Tripathi, R. (2016). Assessment Centers: Benefits and Shortcomings. International Journal of Emerging Research in Management &Technology. 5(2): 31-34.
  42. Tziner, A., & Dolan, S. (1982). Validity of an assessment center for identifying future female officers in the military.Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(6), 728.
  43. Wells, G. L. (2008). Theory, logic and data: Paths to a more coherent eyewitness science. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(6), 853-859.
  44. Yim Hong, K (2008). Psychological Empowerment of Salespeople: The Construct, Its Inducement, and Consequences on Customer Relationships. A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Drexel University.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار